Where Did Jesus Tell Paul to Go to Be Able to See Again
from Google Images
According to Galatians 2, Paul went up to Jerusalem for a second time fourteen years subsequently his conversion (one:18; two:one; Acts 22:17). Some scholars wonder if Paul went upwards to Jerusalem fourteen years after his get-go visit with Peter, but I am wary of this idea. I base of operations my understanding on the fact that Paul's argument in Galatians appears to be that he had no time to learn his Gospel from any homo, especially from the Apostles at Jerusalem. Paul is giving an account of himself from the very moment of his new birth which occurred on his manner to Damascus when Jesus appeared to him for the first time. It was three years afterward his new birth that he came to Jerusalem, where he spent less than iii weeks with the Apostles, and fourteen years afterward his new birth that he returned to Jerusalem.
After leaving the Apostles at Jerusalem cir. the jump of 38 AD, Paul had been evangelizing Syrian arab republic, Cilicia and Galatia. The Gospel which Paul preached, although the same in essence with that of the Jerusalem Apostles, differed in some primal responsibilities, just Paul insisted that his Gospel came from Jesus despite those differences. Paul's Gospel was neither thought up past man, nor did it come up to him through any human agency (Galatians 1:1). 14 years after his heavenly vision, Paul returned to Jerusalem by revelation (cp. Acts 11:28-30; 12:25). This visit was the very same visit mentioned in Acts 15, and it took place cir. jump of 49 Advertizement. The men from James, whom Paul referred to as false brethren, had tried to insist on circumcision for the gentile laic, Titus, who accompanied Paul to Jerusalem. However, Paul adamantly refused their demands (Galatians ii:iv-5).
Annotation that the initial purpose of Paul's 2d visit to Jerusalem was to get to Jerusalem with the gift for the poor (Galatians 2:1-ii; cp. Acts 11:28-thirty). Paul and Barnabas may have been originally appointed for this job years earlier when the prediction of the famine was fabricated by Agabus, the prophet (cir. 41-44 Advertising), or information technology may have been decided by the church building at Antioch that both Paul and Barnabas take their offering to the poor and at the same time take the issue of circumcision to the Apostles as well. This journey to Jerusalem took place near eleven years later on Paul's first meeting with Peter (Acts 9:27; Galatians 1:eighteen; Galatians 2:1)
Although he had returned to Jerusalem with a souvenir to the poor, ultimately Paul'south visit was turned into an official visit to explain his Gospel to the leaders at Jerusalem (Acts 15:one-three). Paul first visited, privately, with the leaders of the Jerusalem church (Galatians 2:2), and later on he reported to Jerusalem'southward church building body (Acts 15:five).
One might ask: if Paul did not need homo authorization to preach the gospel, why did he nowadays his Gospel to the leaders in Jerusalem at all (Galatians ii:1-two)? Paul needed the support of the Jerusalem leadership to prevent partitioning amongst the brethren. He was seeking to avert a real church separate between Jewish and gentile Christians. He presented his version of the Gospel to the leadership, privately, in example he had to explain annihilation about his Gospel. Such a thing is done better without a lot of others around preventing progress being made in a give-and-take. Paul was concerned nearly failing both in keeping Church unity and in preventing a victory past the agitators in successfully attacking and undoing all Paul had been doing among the gentiles (Galatians two:2c). If Paul refused to encounter with the Jewish leaders at Jerusalem, the agitators (the men from James) could argue that Paul was uncooperative and a rebel in the community.
The proof that the Jerusalem authorities (i.e. the Apostles) agreed with Paul was the fact that Titus, a Greek was not compelled to be circumcised (Galatians 2:three). Although the faux brethren sought to compel Titus to be circumcised (Acts 15:i, five), the church leaders at Jerusalem didn't agree. This is meaning in that, if the Jerusalem church building leaders (which included the Apostles) didn't require gentile circumcision in order to exist saved, and so Paul was misrepresented by the agitators at Galatia, and the Council'due south decision showed the men from James were clearly incorrect and overstepped their authorisation in what they did, while bringing news of the state of the poor at Jerusalem.
Source: https://thingspaulandluke.wordpress.com/2015/12/26/pauls-official-meeting-with-the-apostles/
0 Response to "Where Did Jesus Tell Paul to Go to Be Able to See Again"
Post a Comment